iPhone 12 benchmark results Android phones should just give up now

Apple promised big performance gains from the A14 Bionic processor that powers the latest iPhone 12 models. And based on our testing of both the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro, the company wasn’t kidding about what the A14 can do. In fact, the iPhone 12 series once again leaves the best Android phones in the dust.

In both synthetic benchmarks and real-world tests, the new 5nm A14 chip beat every Android phone out there. This means that the gap between the iPhone 12 and the competition has widened again, at least until Qualcomm can answer with its Snapdragon 875 chip.

Apple told us this would happen. When it announced its new iPhones this month, it promised a 50% jump in performance and graphics, among other improvements. We haven’t seen those kind of gains when comparing the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro to some more recent models, but the latest iPhones certainly outperform their predecessors.

Measuring a phone’s performance involves more than just raw numbers. The folks testing these phones for our iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro reviews report that the new phones have handled anything they can throw at it, including some very demanding games. Still, benchmarks help us illustrate those impressions of a faster, more responsive phone.

Here’s what we’ve recorded for the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro so far.

iPhone 12: Geekbench 5 results

Geekbench 5 measures general performance. It’s a test the iPhone usually dominates, and that’s continuing with the iPhone 12.

Phone Processor Geekbench 5 single-core result Geekbench 5 multicore result
iPhone 12 A14 Bionic 1,593 3.859
iPhone 12 Pro A14 Bionic 1,585 3,669
iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic 1.334 3.517
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Snapdragon 865 Plus 985 3,294
Samsung galaxy s20 plus Snapdragon 865 811 3.076
OnePlus 8T Snapdragon 865 887 3,203
ROG Phone 3 Snapdragon 865 Plus 974 3.393
Google pixel 5 Snapdragon 765G 596 1.617

The iPhone 12 posts the best numbers in Geekbench 5, with a single core score of 1,593 and a multicore score of 3,859. Those are improvements 19% and 10%, respectively, over the iPhone 11 Pro Max’s single-core and multicore results in the same test. The iPhone 12 Pro finished just behind the iPhone 12, with scores of 1,585 and 3,669.

More importantly, both iPhones beat out all of the recent Android devices we’ve tested. The ROG Phone 3 from Asus had the best results in Geekbench, thanks to its Snapdragon 865 Plus chipset, an overclocked version of the standard 865. But the ROG Phone 3’s single core and multicore scores of 974 and 3,3393 are well behind what you see from the iPhone 12 models. Other Android flagships like the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Galaxy S20 Plus also lag behind.

iPhone 12: Graphics benchmark

For graphics, we used 3DMark’s new Wild Life test, a new cross-platform benchmark meant to compare graphics performance on new handsets. This benchmark has phones render complex scenes in real-time, as it looks to mirror games that feature short bursts of intense activity.

Phone Processor 3DMark Wild Life score 3DMark Wild Life frames per second
iPhone 12 A14 Bionic 6.562 39
iPhone 12 Pro A14 Bionic 6.567 39
iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic 7.709 42
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Snapdragon 865 Plus 4,182 25
Samsung galaxy s20 plus Snapdragon 865 3,809 23
OnePlus 8T Snapdragon 865 3,772 23
Google pixel 5 Snapdragon 765G 1.138 7

We ran into a surprise with this test where the iPhone 11 Pro Max actually posted a better result than the new iPhones, averaging a score of 7,709 or 42 frames per second. The iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro turned in similar results to each other at 6,562 and 6,567, respectively. That translates to 39 fps.

While we puzzle why the older iPhone fared better on this particular benchmark, it’s worth noting that the Android phones we’ve tested so far with 3DMark Wild Life finish well behind the iPhone 12. The best result we’ve gotten as we retest recently released phones comes from the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, which turned in a result of 4,182 (25 FPS). The iPhone 12 Pro’s result is 57% better.

iPhone 12: Video encoding results

A real-world test we like to run on premium phones involves the Adobe’s Premiere Rush app. In this test, we time how long it takes for a phone to transcode a short 4K video to 1080p. The iPhone usually excels on this test, though recent Android phones have improved. They’re going to have to become even more powerful if they want to catch the iPhone 12, though.

Phone Processor Adobe Premiere Rush encoding time (Mins: Secs)
iPhone 12 A14 Bionic 0:26
iPhone 12 Pro A14 Bionic 0:27
iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic 0:45
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Snapdragon 865 Plus 1:16
Samsung galaxy s20 plus Snapdragon 865 1:13
OnePlus 8T Snapdragon 865 1:38
ROG Phone 3 Snapdragon 865 Plus 1:35
Google pixel 5 Snapdragon 765G 2:52

The iPhone 12 Pro took care of our video in 27 seconds, while the iPhone 12 shaved a second off that time. That’s an impressive improvement over the iPhone 11 Pro Max’s previously pace-setting time of 46 seconds.

The best an Android phone has mustered in our video encoding test has been the 1 minute and 13 second time that the Galaxy S20 Plus turned in earlier this year, though the Note 20 Ultra finished three seconds behind that. It takes the OnePlus 8T and ROG Phone 3 more than 90 seconds to do something the iPhone 12 completes in less than half-a-minute.

iPhone 12 performance outlook

There’s plenty to consider when buying a new smartphone, from battery life to how well the cameras measure up. But if you’re wondering abut performance, you can be confident that the iPhone 12 and its A14 processor will be up to any task. It’s time for Android phones to play catchup – again.

Back to top button